Informace o publikaci

Argumentation 2011

Autoři

ŠKOP Martin ARASZKIEWICZ Michal MYŠKA Matěj SMEJKALOVÁ Terezie ŠAVELKA Jaromír

Rok publikování 2011
Druh Editorství tématického sborníku
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Právnická fakulta

Citace
Popis Argumentation, reasoning and justification have always been inherent parts of lawyers’ work. Lawyers themselves are obviously well aware of the fact and would almost unanimously acknowledge that enhancing one’s knowledge and skills in argumentation has a direct impact on the quality of their work. The theoretical approach to the argumentation is usually concerned with the study of the nature and structure of arguments, development of models and frameworks of argumentation and assessment of ways to strengthen or attack arguments. The ambition of the conference is to establish a permanent platform to discuss and explore the alternative methods of legal argumentation, i.e. those that are not regularly employed in everyday legal practice, but would prove extremely valuable if adopted. It is thus our intention to bring new stimuli to both the approaches to the argumentation by showing that the outcomes of both are valuable and can be combined in coherent theories. The conference consists of four workshops/streams each specialized in a specific and unique method of studying legal argumentation: Formal Methods in Legal Reasoning Law and Literature Law and Language Visualization of Law.

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info