Publication details
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2016 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | International urogynecology journal |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2 |
| Field | Gynaecology and obstetrics |
| Keywords | Stress urinary incontinence; Mid-urethral sling; Single-incision sling ; Efficacy; Patient-reported outcomes; Randomized controlled trial |
| Description | Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient’s life quality. |