Publication details

The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: A multicohort study

Authors	MARTENSSON G. FERREIRA D. GRANBERG T. CAVALLIN L. OPPEDAL K. PADOVANI A. REKTOROVÁ Irena BONANNI L. PARDINI M. KRAMBERGER M. G. TAYLOR J. P. HORT J. SNAEDAL J. KULISEVSKY J. BLANC F. ANTONINI A. MECOCCI P. VELLAS B. TSOLAKI M. KLOSZEWSKA I. SOININEN H. LOVESTONE S. SIMMONS A. AARSLAND D. WESTMAN E.
Year of publication	2020
Type	Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source	Medical Image Analysis
MU Faculty or unit	Central European Institute of Technology
Citation
Web	https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841520300785
Doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101714
Keywords	Neuroimaging; Deep learning; Domain shift; Clinical application
Description	Deep learning (DL) methods have in recent years yielded impressive results in medical imaging, with the potential to function as clinical aid to radiologists. However, DL models in medical imaging are often trained on public research cohorts with images acquired with a single scanner or with strict protocol harmonization, which is not representative of a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to investigate how well a DL model performs in unseen clinical datasets-collected with different scanners, protocols and disease populations-and whether more heterogeneous training data improves generalization. In total, 3117 MRI scans of brains from multiple dementia research cohorts and memory clinics, that had been visually rated by a neuroradiologist according to Scheltens' scale of medial temporal atrophy (MTA), were included in this study. By training multiple versions of a convolutional neural network on different subsets of this data to predict MTA ratings, we assessed the impact of including images from a wider distribution during training had on performance in external memory clinic data. Our results showed that our model generalized well to datasets acquired with similar protocols as the training data, but substantially worse in clinical cohorts with visibly different tissue contrasts in the images. This implies that future DL studies investigating performance in out-of-distribution (OOD) MRI data need to assess multiple external cohorts for reliable results. Further, by including data from a wider range of scanners and protocols the performance improved in OOD data, which suggests that more heterogeneous training data makes the model generalize better. To conclude, this is the most comprehensive study to date investigating the domain shift in deep learning on MRI data, and we advocate rigorous evaluation of DL models on clinical data prior to being certified for deployment. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.