Publication details
Gender Gaps in Policy Responsiveness
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2023 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | Political Research Quarterly |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| web | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129221136476 |
| Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10659129221136476 |
| Keywords | Gender; race and identity; public opinion; representation and electoral systems; women and politics |
| Attached files | |
| Description | Gender gaps have been documented in numerous areas of American politics, but one area that has not yet been fully explored is responsiveness, the link between citizen preferences and public policies. Equal responsiveness to the preferences of citizens is a central aspect of democratic representation. This article extends work on income gaps in responsiveness to gender gaps. Specifically, it considers whether women’s preferences are less likely than men’s preferences to be adopted as policy in the US. It uses data on preferences and policy adoptions from 1981 to 2002 created by Gilens. The main finding is a large gender gap in responsiveness. The gap is similar in size to the one between rich and poor, it is particularly large in policies related to the use of force, and it did not narrow over the two decades studied. These results show that inequalities beyond social class deserve significant attention in the study of democratic responsiveness and that aspects of bias against women in politics remain underexplored. |
| Related projects: |