Publication details

Donor nerve selection in free gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

Authors

BAYEZID Kadir Can JOUKAL Marek KARABULUT Erdem MACEK Jan MORAVCOVÁ Ludmila STREIT Libor

Year of publication 2023
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
web https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681523001638?via%3Dihub
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.014
Keywords Facial palsy; Facial reanimation; Free gracilis muscle transfer; Dual innervated free gracilis flap
Description Background: One of the critical factors in facial reanimation is selecting the donor nerve. The most favored neurotizers are the contralateral facial nerve with a cross-face nerve graft (CFNG) and motor nerve to the masseter (MNM). A relatively new dual innervation (DI) method has shown successful results. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of different neurotization strategies for free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT). Methods: The Scopus and WoS databases were queried with 21 keywords. Three-stage article selection was performed for the systematic review. Articles presenting quantitative data for commissure excursion and facial symmetry were included in meta-analysis, using random-ef- fects model. ROBINS-I tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess bias and study quality. Results: One hundred forty-seven articles containing FGMT were systematically reviewed. Most studies indicated CFNG as the first choice. MNM was primarily indicated in bilateral palsy and in elderly. Clinical outcomes of DI studies were promising. 13 studies including 435 observations (179 CFNG, 182 MNM, 74 DI) were eligible for meta-analysis. The mean change in commissure excursion was 7.15 mm (95% CI: 4.57-9.72) for CFNG, 8.46 mm (95% CI: 6.86-10.06) for MNM, and 5.18 mm (95% CI: 4.01-6.34) for DI. In pairwise comparisons, a significant difference was found between MNM and DI (p = 0.0011), despite the superior outcomes described in DI studies.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info