Publication details

Methodological constrains of tree-ring stable isotope chronologies

Authors

AROSIO Tito TORBENSON Max BEBCHUK Tatiana KIRDYANOV Alexander ESPER Jan NAKATSUKA Takeshi SANO Masaki URBAN Otmar NICOLUSSI Kurt LEUENBERGER Markus BÜNTGEN Ulf

Year of publication 2024
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Quaternary Science Reviews
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
web https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379124003627
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108861
Keywords Climate reconstructions; Proxy data; Stable isotopes; Spectral properties; Tree rings
Description Tree-ring stable isotope (TRSI) chronologies that combine information from living and relict wood have the potential to capture long-term trends that might be missing in traditional tree-ring width and maximum latewood density measurements. Our understanding of the possible effects of different methods to develop TRSI chronologies is, however, still incomplete. Here, we compare and evaluate five such methods applied to three multi-millennial-long oxygen isotope (?18O) TRSI datasets from central Europe, the European Alps and Japan: (a) raw data, (b) cohort correction, (c) interactive mean correction, (d) outlier correction, and (e) series normalization. We show that the spectral properties preserved in the final TRSI chronologies not only depend on the data used, but also on the techniques applied. Method (a) is particularly prone to outliers if the sample size is low. Method (b) may create artificial steps and trends when single measurement series share similar start dates and/or when end and start dates are systematically skewed. Methods (c) and (d) yield similar results for annually resolved data, yet (d) is more suitable for temporally pooled datasets and less sensitive to potential biological age effects. Method (e) removes any low-frequency signal. Our findings demonstrate the risks and rewards of different TRSI chronology development techniques that must be carefully adapted to both, the data used and the question posed.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info