Publication details

Belzutifan versus Everolimus for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Authors

CHOUEIRI T. K. POWLES T. PELTOLA K. DE VELASCO G. BUROTTO M. SUAREZ C. GHATALIA P. IACOVELLI R. LAM E. T. VERZONI E. GUMUS M. STADLER W. M. KOLLMANNSBERGER C. MELICHAR B. VENUGOPAL B. GROSS-GOUPIL M. POPRACH Alexandr DE SANTIS M. SCHUTZ F. A. PARK S. H. NOSOV D. A. PORTA C. LEE J. L. GARCIA-DEL-MURO X. BISCALDI E. KOPP R Manneh OYA M. HE L. WANG A. PERINI R. F. VICKERY D. ALBIGES L. RINI B.

Year of publication 2024
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source New England Journal of Medicine
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
web https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2313906
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2313906
Keywords Belzutifan; Everolimus; Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Description Background Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha inhibitor, showed clinical activity in clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma in early-phase studies. Methods In a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled trial, we enrolled participants with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had previously received immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic therapies and randomly assigned them, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive 120 mg of belzutifan or 10 mg of everolimus orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. The dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. The key secondary end point was the occurrence of an objective response (a confirmed complete or partial response). Download a PDF of the Plain Language Summary. Results A total of 374 participants were assigned to belzutifan, and 372 to everolimus. At the first interim analysis (median follow-up, 18.4 months), the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in both groups; at 18 months, 24.0% of the participants in the belzutifan group and 8.3% in the everolimus group were alive and free of progression (two-sided P=0.002, which met the prespecified significance criterion). A confirmed objective response occurred in 21.9% of the participants (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.8 to 26.5) in the belzutifan group and in 3.5% (95% CI, 1.9 to 5.9) in the everolimus group (P<0.001, which met the prespecified significance criterion). At the second interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.7 months), the median overall survival was 21.4 months in the belzutifan group and 18.1 months in the everolimus group; at 18 months, 55.2% and 50.6% of the participants, respectively, were alive (hazard ratio for death, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.07; two-sided P=0.20, which did not meet the prespecified significance criterion). Grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 61.8% of the participants in the belzutifan group (grade 5 in 3.5%) and in 62.5% in the everolimus group (grade 5 in 5.3%). Adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in 5.9% and 14.7% of the participants, respectively. Conclusions Belzutifan showed a significant benefit over everolimus with respect to progression-free survival and objective response in participants with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had previously received immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic therapies. Belzutifan was associated with no new safety signals. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; LITESPARK-005 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04195750.)

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info