Publication details

Role of Empathy in Judicial Decision-Making

Authors

VOSINEK Michal

Year of publication 2024
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Law

Citation
Web https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2024-0020
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2024-0020
Keywords empathy; judgment; psychology; virtue; emotion; cognition
Description This article examines the role of empathy in judicial decision-making from the perspective of virtue ethics. It starts with an exploration of virtue ethics and extends to an examination of empathy, concentrating on its affective, cognitive, and compassionate aspects. In effect, the article considers one of the essential traits and skills of a ‘good’ judge, emphasizing the significance of this discourse for shaping judicial decision-making. Two prominent U. S. Supreme Court cases are highlighted to showcase the potential impact and importance of em-pathy in legal proceedings. The article further explores how empathy can be developed among legal practitioners. Ultimately, this article argues that while empathy can be generally deemed a virtue, its appropriateness is highly context dependent.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info