Publication details

Systematic Review on the Cost Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening in Europe

Authors

VYNCKIER Pieter ANNEMANS Lieven RAES Sarah AMROUCH Cheima LINDGREN Peter MÁJEK Ondřej BEYER Katharina LEENEN Renee C A VENDERBOS Lionne D F DENIJS Frederique VAN HARTEN Meike J HELLEMAN Jozien CHLOUPKOVÁ Renata BRIERS Erik VASILYEVA Vera RIVAS Juan Gomez BASU Partha CHANDRAN Arunah VAN DEN BERGH Roderick C N COLLEN Sarah VAN POPPEL Hein ROOBOL Monique J

Year of publication 2024
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source European Urology
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
web https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283824023789?via%3Dihub
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.036
Keywords Prostate cancer; Screening; Cost effectiveness; PRostate cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union
Description Background and objective: In Europe, prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men. Screening may therefore be crucial to lower health care costs, morbidity, and mortality. This systematic review aimed to provide a contemporary overview of the costs and benefits of PCa screening programmes. Methods: A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted, using the PICO method. A detailed search strategy was developed in four databases based on the following key search terms: "PCa", "screening", and "cost effectiveness". Any type of economic evaluation was included. The search strategy was restricted to European countries, but no restrictions were set on the year of publication. Key findings and limitations: A total of 7484 studies were identified initially. Of these, 19 studies described the cost effectiveness of PCa screening in Europe. Among the studies using an initially healthy study population, most focussed on risk- and/or age- and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based screening in addition to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and compared this with no screening. Incremental cost ratios (ICERs) varied from 5872 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) to 372 948/QALY, with a median of 56 487/QALY. Risk-based screening followed by MRI testing seemed to be a more cost-effective strategy than no screening. Conclusions and clinical implications: This systematic review indicates that screening programmes incorporating a risk-based approach and MRI have the potential to be cost effective. Patient summary: In this review, we looked at the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening in Europe. We found that a risk-based approach and incorporation of magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to be cost effective. However, there remains a knowledge gap regarding cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. Therefore, determinants of cost effectiveness require further investigation. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info