You are here:
Publication details
Conflict of Laws, the Ordre Public Reservation and the Nuremberg Laws in British Jurisprudence in the 1930s and 1940s
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2024 |
| Type | Paper in proceedings |
| Conference | Edge of Tomorrow: The Next Generation of Legal Historians and Romanist 2 |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| web | Open access kapitoly |
| Doi | https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0628-2024-11 |
| Keywords | Nazi Law; Private International Law; Law Applicable; Forum; Penalty Provision; Ordre Public; Racial Legislation; Nuremberg Laws; Case Law; United Kingdom |
| Description | The article presents the case law of the British courts in the 1930s and 1940s, that dealt with the law applicable and, where appropriate, the forum. Specifically, cases in which the application of the Private International Law and its principles pointed to German (Nazi) law as the law applicable or referred the forum to Germany (the then Third Reich). The article presents a summary of these decisions through the eyes of the British courts and how they dealt with the issue. |
| Related projects: |