Publication details

Determining the extent and stage of disease in patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using 18F-FDG-PET/CT

Authors

PAPAJÍK Tomáš MYSLIVEČEK Miroslav SKOPALOVÁ M. MALAN A. BURIÁNKOVÁ Eva KOZA V. HNÁTKOVÁ M. TRNĚNÝ M. ŠEDOVÁ Zuzana KUBOVÁ Zuzana KORANDA Pavel FLODR Patrik JARKOVSKÝ Jiří DUŠEK Ladislav INDRÁK Karel

Year of publication 2011
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Neoplasma
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.4149/neo_2011_04_291
Field Oncology and hematology
Keywords 18F-FDG PET; PET/CT; CT; non-Hodgkins lymphoma staging
Description Positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) combined with computed tomography (CT) represents a three-dimensional imaging method suitable for staging in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHLs). The aim of our prospective multicenter study was to assess the value of initial PET/CT as compared with CT and PET alone for determining the stage and extent of the disease. A total of 122 patients with newly diagnosed NHL were examined using PET/CT. Four patients with resected lymphoma lesion and negative PET/CT were therefore excluded from the study. Of the remaining 118 cases, a total of 117 (99%) were described as 18F-FDG-avid. When compared with PET/CT, CT and PET showed very good sensitivity of lymph node imaging (97% and 100%, respectively); the specificity, however, was significantly lower (66.7% and 94.4%, respectively; p=0.0001). When detecting organ lesions, the sensitivity of CT and PET was lower than that of PET/CT (92.5% and 96.3%, respectively; p=0.0001); specificity was significantly decreased in CT and a little lower in PET (59.5% and 91.9%; p=0.0001). When compared with CT alone, PET/CT changed staging of the disease in 11 patients (9%) and was able to detect a total of 82 discrepancies in 67 of the 117 patients (57%). In conclusion, PET/CT is a new standard in imaging the involvement of lymph nodes and extranodal organs in NHL patients regardless of their histopathological types. Both sensitivity and specificity of the examination are higher than those of CT as well as PET alone.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info