Informace o publikaci

Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles Associated With Different Types of Short Bowel Syndrome: Implications for Treatment

Autoři	BUDINSKÁ Eva GOJDA Jan HECZKOVA Marie BRATOVA Miriam DANKOVA Helena WOHL Petr BASTOVA Hana LANSKA Vera KOSTOVCIK Martin DASTYCH Milan SENKYRIK Michal KRIZOVA Jarmila MRAZ Milos HRADECKY Jaromir HAJSLOVA Jana LENICEK Martin PODZIMKOVA Katerina CHALUPSKY Karel SEDLACEK Rastislav CAHOVA Monika
Rok publikování	2020
Druh	Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj	Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU	Přírodovědecká fakulta
Citace
www	https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1595
Doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1595
Klíčová slova	bile acids; gut microbiota; parenteral nutrition; short bowel syndrome; short-chain fatty acids; volatile organic compounds
Popis	Background The gut microbiome and metabolome may significantly influence clinical outcomes in patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS). The study aimed to describe specific metagenomic/metabolomics profiles of different SBS types and to identify possible therapeutic targets. Methods Fecal microbiome (FM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and bile acid (BA) spectrum were analyzed in parenteral nutrition (PN)-dependent SBS I, SBS II, and PN-independent (non-PN) SBS patients. Results FM in SBS I, SBS II, and non-PN SBS shared characteristic features (depletion of beneficial anaerobes, high abundance of Lactobacilaceae and Enterobacteriaceae). SBS I patients were characterized by the abundance of oxygen-tolerant microrganisms and depletion of strict anaerobes. Non-PN SBS subjects showed markers of partial FM normalization. FM dysbiosis was translated into VOC and BA profiles characteristic for each SBS cohort. A typical signature of all SBS patients comprised high saturated aldehydes and medium-chain fatty acids and reduced short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) content. Particularly, SBS I and II exhibited low protein metabolism intermediate (indole, p-cresol) content despite the hypothetical presence of relevant metabolism pathways. Distinctive non-PN SBS marker was high phenol content. SBS patients' BA fecal spectrum was enriched by chenodeoxycholic and deoxycholic acids and depleted of lithocholic acid. Conclusions Environmental conditions in SBS gut significantly affect FM composition and metabolic activity. The common feature of diverse SBS subjects is the altered VOC/BA profile and the lack of important products of microbial metabolism. Strategies oriented on the microbiome/metabolome reconstitution and targeted delivery of key compounds may represent a promising therapeutic strategy in SBS patients.