Informace o publikaci

Rethinking primacy’s effects: On creating, avoiding and filling legal vacuums in the national legal system

Logo poskytovatele
Autoři

LELOUP Mathieu SPIEKER Luke Dimitrios SPIEKER Luke Dimitrios

Rok publikování 2024
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Právnická fakulta

Citace
www https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/61.1/COLA2024064
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/cola2024064
Klíčová slova legal vacuums; court of justice; EUropean Union law; primacy
Popis While much ink has been spilled on the primacy of EU law, many of its features still remain underexplored. Leaving aside the ubiquitous struggle over primacy’s absolute character for a moment, this article takes a deep dive into primacy’s effects on the daily work of domestic judges. We analyse, systematize and rethink the steps that they are supposed to take after finding that national law conflicts with EU law. In a first step, primacy requires them to disapply the respective national provision (primacy’s negative effect). A recent line of cases goes even further, suggesting that judges might not only be obliged to disapply, but even to invalidate national law. This contribution sheds some light on these developments and assesses their risks and added value. Second, the act of disapplying national law may create a problematic legal vacuum in the domestic legislative framework. Therefore, national judges are increasingly reaching out to the Court of Justice, asking to avoid such gaps by limiting primacy’s temporal effects. Yet, in the absence of such suspension, the domestic judges will need to take the positive step of filling the vacuum (primacy’s positive effects). This article provides a novel systematization of the various situations with which domestic judges may be confronted, showing how ever more legal ingenuity and judicial creativity are required. Finally, the article demonstrates how these requirements may create tensions with fundamental principles of domestic constitutional law, such as the separation of power, the judicial architecture and legal certainty.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info