You are here:
Publication details
With or without Automaticity: Interference and Negative Priming Effects as Indicators of (Lacking) Convergent Validity in Two Computerized Stroop-like Tasks
Authors | |
---|---|
Year of publication | 2017 |
Type | Appeared in Conference without Proceedings |
MU Faculty or unit | |
Citation | |
Description | Although significant interference and negative priming effects could be observed in two Stroop-like tasks regardless of the level of asymmetry (i.e. varying degree of automaticity) in target vs. distractor processing, these effects were unrelated across the tasks, suggesting a lack of convergent validity in tasks that are typically used interchangeably. |