Publication details
Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2021 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | European Constitutional Law Review |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| web | Open access časopisu |
| Doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000377 |
| Keywords | the European Court of Human Rights; exit; international courts; reform |
| Attached files | |
| Description | States’ growing dissatisfaction with the performance of the European Court of Human Rights – Governments’ commitment to reform process – Threats of exit that failed to materialise – Adaptation of Hirschman’s exit–voice–loyalty framework to explain states’ non-exit from the European Court of Human Rights – Sufficiently effective voice, manifestations of loyalty, and high costs of exit as possible reasons behind non-exit – Governments’ inability to achieve change in the Court’s practice unilaterally – Divergent perceptions and expectations of governments – Court’s responsiveness to governments’ concerns – Showing the importance of cautious, incremental changes to accommodate diverse governmental expectations on the role of the European Court of Human Rights |
| Related projects: |