Publication details
Několik poznámek k podmínkám použití výkladu a analogie při rozhodování o odnětí a přikázání věci podle § 25 TrŘ v přípravném řízení trestním
| Title in English | Some Remarks on Conditions of Use of Explanation and Analogy while Decision on Case Removal within Preliminary Proceedings acording to section 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Year of publication | 2007 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | Trestněprávní revue |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| Field | Law sciences |
| Keywords | preliminary proceedings; criminal procedure; removal of the case; Supreme Public Prosecutor; independence |
| Description | Decision on competence in preliminary proceedings is limited by law. The Supreme Public Prosecutors Office cannot arbitrarily act in pending criminal proceedings in such a way that on insufficient criteria or based on different purpose-built reasons it decides which state prosecutor will be charge by concrete criminal case unless it is concerning the high prosecution office. |