Informace o publikaci
The "dialogue of judges" and the mutual influence of constitutional concepts in Europe: How the interpretation of national fundamental rights is influenced by the fundamental rights of the ECHR and the EC general principles as well as by a horizontal exchange of ideas of national constitutional Courts? Examples from the Czech Republic
| Autoři | |
|---|---|
| Rok publikování | 2009 |
| Druh | Článek ve sborníku |
| Konference | Comparing Constitutional Adjudication - A Summer School on Comparative Interpretation of European Constitutional Jurisprudence |
| Fakulta / Pracoviště MU | |
| Citace | |
| www | http://www.jus.unitn.it/cocoa/papers/PAPERS%204TH%20PDF/Judges%20Czech%20Kokes.pdf |
| Obor | Právní vědy |
| Klíčová slova | ECHR; The Czech Constitutional Court; dialogue of courts and judges; ratio decidendi; case law |
| Popis | The examples observed above should have illustrated the general tendency in the case-law of the Czech Constitutional Court to reflect and to use the Strasbourg Courts Case-law as ratio decidendi of its own decisions. So in purpose of the topic - the dialogue between judges I could claim that the Czech Constitutional Courts Case-law is in particular cases strongly influenced by the Strasbourg Courts case-law. |