Publication details
The "dialogue of judges" and the mutual influence of constitutional concepts in Europe: How the interpretation of national fundamental rights is influenced by the fundamental rights of the ECHR and the EC general principles as well as by a horizontal exchange of ideas of national constitutional Courts? Examples from the Czech Republic
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2009 |
| Type | Article in Proceedings |
| Conference | Comparing Constitutional Adjudication - A Summer School on Comparative Interpretation of European Constitutional Jurisprudence |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| Web | http://www.jus.unitn.it/cocoa/papers/PAPERS%204TH%20PDF/Judges%20Czech%20Kokes.pdf |
| Field | Law sciences |
| Keywords | ECHR; The Czech Constitutional Court; dialogue of courts and judges; ratio decidendi; case law |
| Description | The examples observed above should have illustrated the general tendency in the case-law of the Czech Constitutional Court to reflect and to use the Strasbourg Courts Case-law as ratio decidendi of its own decisions. So in purpose of the topic - the dialogue between judges I could claim that the Czech Constitutional Courts Case-law is in particular cases strongly influenced by the Strasbourg Courts case-law. |