Project information
Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse
- Project Identification
- GA405/08/0866
- Project Period
- 1/2008 - 12/2012
- Investor / Pogramme / Project type
-
Czech Science Foundation
- Standard Projects
- MU Faculty or unit
- Faculty of Education
- Keywords
- coherence, cohesion, discourse, interaction, language means, explicitness, implicitness, genres, registers
The aim of the Project is twofold: 1) to conceptualize cohesion and coherence as constitutive components of human communication, and 2) to apply theoretical insights to an analysis of written and spoken English discourse. For this purpose, specialized collections of texts will be created. The analysis will scrutinize how coherence is achieved in different genres (face-to-face and telephone conversation, panel discussions, public speaking, media and academic discourse) and how cohesion enhaces a coherent interpretation of discourse.The features contributing to the perception of cohesion and coherence in different genres will be contrasted.
Results
The project explored aspects of coherence and cohesion in different genres of spoken and written discourse. The
theoretical research was focused on defining concepts related with coherence and cohesion and on motivating the
choice of a dynamic, interpretative approach to coherence and cohesion which is seen as contextually bound. The
understanding of cohesion and coherence and the approach applied to the analysis of these phenomena is based on
the functional approach to language phenomena and is rooted in the research methodology developed within the
fields of discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis and genre analysis. Within this approach the construal of
coherence and cohesion is perceived on all planes of discourse (ideational, interpersonal and textual); the
interpersonal plane is considered to be primary as the interpretation of the relations on the ideational and textual plane
are dependent on the established interpersonal meaning relations. A further outcome of the theoretical investigation
was the development of models for the analysis of the situational context and of aspects of coherence and cohesion. It
is therefore possible to state that the objectives of the theoretical investigation were successfully met.
Publications
Total number of publications: 71
2010
-
Can non-native speakers of English use contrastive discourse markers correctly when writing academic tetxs?
... for thy speech bewrayeth thee. A Festschrift for Libuše Dušková, edition: 1. vyd., year: 2010, number of pages: 23 s.
-
Crime news in British press: Expressing positive and negative status of core participants
Discourse and Interaction, year: 2010, volume: roč. 3, edition: 1
-
Exploring Sequential Relationships in Learner Discourse
Exploring Space: Spatial Notions in Cultural, Literary and Language Studies; Volume 2, Space in Language Studies, edition: 1. vydání, year: 2010, number of pages: 12 s.
-
Hedging in Academic Writing: The Outline of a New Perspective
Year: 2010, type:
-
Hedging in Research Articles: A Comparative Study
Year: 2010, type: Appeared in Conference without Proceedings
-
Hedging in Research Articles: A Comparison
Year: 2010, type:
-
Hedging in Research Articles: Humanities and Social Sciences Compared
Year: 2010, type: Conference abstract
-
Interactive Discourse Markers in Spoken English
Year: 2010, edition: 1. vyd., number of pages: 192 s.
-
Interpreting meaning in spoken interaction: the case of I mean. In: I Mean. Conference Proceedings. First International Conference on Meaning in Interaction. University of the West of England, Bristol, 23-25 April, 2009
Year: 2010, type: R&D Presentation
-
Interpreting modality markers in political speeches. In: I-Mean. Conference Proceedings. First International Conference on Meaning in Interaction University of the West of England, Bristol, 23-25 April, 2009.
Year: 2010, type: R&D Presentation